Tis is the nature of Substack. I have the opposite problem, most of my older stuff was simply not as good. Over time, Risk & Progress has evolved its mission, only reaching its current form about a year ago. Most of my early stuff was transferred from Medium as well, where there was a very different audience. I have steadily been deleting out older essays, editing and revising, and sometimes entirely rewriting them. I think we are unique in trying to compile a curated collection, I am revising mine daily at this point: https://www.lianeon.org/p/starthere
One of the best things about Substack is that it enables writers to update their content at will. I also spend a significant amount of time updating old posts, particularly adding links to newer articles.
Tis is the nature of Substack. I have the opposite problem, most of my older stuff was simply not as good. Over time, Risk & Progress has evolved its mission, only reaching its current form about a year ago. Most of my early stuff was transferred from Medium as well, where there was a very different audience. I have steadily been deleting out older essays, editing and revising, and sometimes entirely rewriting them. I think we are unique in trying to compile a curated collection, I am revising mine daily at this point: https://www.lianeon.org/p/starthere
One of the best things about Substack is that it enables writers to update their content at will. I also spend a significant amount of time updating old posts, particularly adding links to newer articles.
Constant interation…